This picture was taken from Interstate 90 near Livingston, Montana |
Search Corbin's Blog
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Rape and Custody
Rape is in the news with the recent comments of U.S. Congressional Representative Todd Akin. Given the fact that biological fathers have constitutional level rights to parent their child, a rapist may legally assert claims to parenting time in the event his victim becomes pregnant and gives birth. Here is an article written by a rape victim recounting that experience.
Monday, August 20, 2012
Revising Equitable Division in light of Funk
This is my August 17, 2012 revision of a draft equitable division statutory proposal to replace Section 40-4-202 M.C.A. to address issues arising from Marriage of Funk, 2012 MT 14. Please give me your comments/corrections/revisions.
1.
Generally.
a.
In a
proceeding for dissolution of a marriage, legal separation, or division of net
worth following a decree of dissolution of marriage or legal separation by a
court which lacked personal jurisdiction over the absent spouse or lacked
jurisdiction to divide the assets and liabilities of the parties, the court,
without regard to marital misconduct, shall, and in a proceeding for legal
separation may, determine in accordance with the factors set forth below, the
marital and non-marital net worth of the parties and finally apportion between
the parties all assets and liabilities belonging to either or both, however and
whenever acquired and whether the title thereto is in the name of the husband
or wife or both.
b.
The
assets to be divided between the parties may include both marital assets and
non-marital assets. An asset may be categorized as partly marital and partly
non-marital.
c.
The
liabilities to be divided between the parties may include both marital
liabilities and non-marital liabilities. A liability may be categorized as
partly marital and partly non-marital.
2.
Definitions.
a.
Marital
Assets are defined as follows:
i.
All
assets received or acquired by either party during the marriage except for
non-marital assets.
ii.
All assets
received or acquired by either party during the marriage shall be presumed to
be marital assets except to the extent proven to be non-marital by clear and
convincing evidence of an affirmative intention to retain the asset as
non-marital.
iii.
When
marital and non-marital assets have been comingled to a degree that no portion
of the value of an asset is reasonably traceable to the value of a non-marital asset,
the asset shall be treated as a marital asset.
b.
Marital
Liabilities are defined as follows:
i.
All
liabilities incurred by either party during the marriage except for non-marital
liabilities.
ii.
All
liabilities incurred by either party during the marriage shall be presumed to
be marital liabilities except to the extent proven to be non-marital by clear
and convincing evidence.
iii.
When
marital and non-marital liabilities have been comingled to a degree that no
portion of the liability is reasonably traceable to a non-marital liability, the
liability shall be treated as a marital liability.
c.
Non-marital
Assets include premarital, gifted and inherited assets, which are defined as
follows:
i.
Premarital
assets: assets which were separately owned by a party before the marriage;
ii.
Gifted
Assets: assets which were all gifted separately to a party during the marriage;
and
iii.
Inherited
Assets: assets which were separately inherited by a party during the marriage.
iv.
A portion
of the value of an asset acquired during the marriage in exchange for
premarital, gifted or inherited asset may be partly categorized as non-marital to
the extent the asset is reasonably traceable thereto.
d.
Non-marital
Liabilities are defined as follows:
i.
Premarital
Liabilities: liabilities which were separately incurred by one party before the
marriage; and
ii.
Liabilities
secured by non-marital assets separately gifted to a party or separately
inherited by a party.
iii.
A portion
of the liability incurred during the marriage which repaid part or all of a
premarital liability or a liability secured by a non-marital asset separately
gifted to a party or separately inherited by a party to the extent the
liability is reasonably traceable thereto.
e.
Post
Separation. Assets acquired and liabilities incurred post separation may be
either marital or non-marital depending on a court’s determination as to the
extent each party directly or indirectly reasonably contributed to the
existence or need for such assets or liabilities
f.
Marital
Net Worth. The court shall subtract the total value of all marital liabilities
(less any non-marital portion thereof) from the total value of all marital
assets (less any non-marital portion thereof) to determine the marital net
worth of the parties.
g.
Non-marital
Net Worth. The court shall subtract the total value of all non-marital
liabilities (less any marital portion thereof) from the total value of all non-marital
assets (less any marital portion thereof) to determine the non-marital net
worth of each party.
3.
Marital
Net Worth. The Court shall equitably allocate the marital net worth between the
parties. In making this apportionment the court shall consider the following
factors:
a.
Duration
of the marriage;
b.
Prior
marriage of either party;
c.
Age and
health of each party;
d.
Occupation,
amount and sources of income, vocational skills, employability of each party;
e.
The
parenting plan for any children of the parties, child support, medical support
and the economic consequences to each party;
f.
Whether
the apportionment of marital net worth is in lieu of or in addition to
maintenance;
g.
Any
maintenance award;
h.
The
financial consequences of the allocation of non-marital net worth to each
party;
i.
Whether
marital assets or income have been used to pay the non-marital liability of one
party;
j.
The
opportunity of each for future acquisition of capital assets and income;
k.
The
economic value of the contribution of a party acting as a homemaker or
otherwise to the family, or directly or indirectly to the marital net worth;
l.
The
dissipation or contribution of each party to the marital net worth;
m. Whether an asset is income producing or income
consuming;
n.
Whether
the allocation of an asset or a liability will cause a reasonably calculable
tax consequence to the party to whom the asset or liability is allocated by the
time the third post-decree tax returns must be filed;
o.
In the event
an asset is ordered sold, the reasonable costs of sale; and
p.
The needs
of the parties.
4.
Non-marital
Net Worth. Each party shall be allocated their respective non-marital net worth
except as follows:
a.
Increases
in Value. Any increase in value of non-marital net worth of a party during the
marriage that is not the result of market forces may be allocated between the
parties equitably using the factors set forth in section 3 above if the
increase in value results from:
i.
Investment
of the earnings of either party during the marriage;
ii.
Investment
of marital net worth during the marriage;
iii.
Investment
of marital labor of either party during the marriage;
iv.
Indirect
contribution of one party to the non-marital net worth of the other party; or
v.
Reinvested
income and capital gain from non-marital net worth if either or both parties
had a substantial active role during the marriage in managing, preserving or
improving the asset.
b.
Decrease
in Non-Marital Liabilities. In the event a non-marital asset of one party is
used to pay the non-marital liability of their spouse, the court may allocate a
portion of the non-marital net worth of the spouse to the party who paid the
liability.
c.
Entire Value. The entire non-marital net worth of
both parties, including all increases in value during the marriage regardless
of cause, may be allocated between both parties equitably using the factors set
forth in section 3 above if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence
that one party’s combined marital and non-marital net worth are otherwise so
inadequate as to work an unfair hardship to that party or to the children of
the parties.
5. In a proceeding,
the court may protect and promote the best interests of the children by setting
aside a portion of the jointly and separately held estates of the parties in a
separate fund or trust for the support, maintenance, education, and general
welfare of any minor, dependent, or incompetent children of the parties.
6. Each spouse is
considered to have a common ownership in marital property that vests
immediately preceding the entry of the decree of dissolution or declaration of
invalidity. The extent of the vested interest must be determined and made final
by the court pursuant to this section.
7. The division and
apportionment of marital property caused by or incident to a decree of
dissolution, a decree of legal separation, or a declaration of invalidity is
not a sale, exchange, transfer, or disposition of or dealing in property but is
a division of the common ownership of the parties for purposes of:
a.
the property laws of this state;
b.
the income tax laws of this state; and
c.
the federal income tax laws.
8.
Premarital agreements must be enforced as provided in Title 40,
chapter 2, part 6.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)